Thursday, May 21, 2015

Misogyny Harms Men Too

            Misogyny is a word that at its root simply means prejudice or discrimination against women. So, the idea that it would affect men in any capacity seems strange at first, and understandably so! The root of the word literally excludes men (Except from being the oppressors.) But my goal in this post is to explain just how, in many capacities, misogyny is not only silly in the first place, but is actually counterproductive for men.
            First of all, it might be good to explain exactly what some examples of misogyny are. Not all misogyny is so blatant and obvious. Often when people think misogyny they think of not hiring women or not allowing women to vote, but it can be much more simple and small than that. Some other common forms of misogyny include viewing women as weak, homemakers, thinking women are overly emotional, or shaming women for how sexually active they are. So how does this effect men negatively? Welllll

Misogyny influences the draft
            Now, I’ve seen some people (Especially Men’s Rights Activists) claim that this is something against men, because men are the only ones that have to register for the draft. And I agree, it’s wrong! (Though, I don’t think equality would be having women register, it would be having no one register.) But it is rooted in misogyny.
            Think of how women were seen at the time of the draft. Women were the homemakers. They were seen as the caretakers, the gentle, nurturing ones that are supposed to be at home. And at first it seems benevolent, but that’s not all. It also paints women as weak and unfit for fighting. It is saying that not only shouldn’t women do this but women can’t do this. And so men are painted as the ones that need to be the protectors, that need to risk their lives. And so our view of women being weak makes it so that only men are affected by the draft and forced into military service.

Misogyny dictates what you can wear
            A woman wears dude clothes and how is she seen? Well, generally either as “like one of the dudes” which is seen as positive among guys, or maybe a lesbian sometimes? Or maybe people think well she’s wearing her boyfriend’s clothes, which means they must be close and have sex! (Because apparently women are some trophy?) But the point is, generally is seen as favorable. And in fact, most “guy” clothes are seen more as, well, androgynous.
            But look at the opposite situation. What is it like when a guy wears a skirt or a dress? He’s a joke, he’s laughed at, he’s shamed. Guys aren’t supposed to do that, that’s shameful. But why? What about wearing women’s clothes could possibly be shameful? The only way we can say that dressing “like a woman” is shameful for a man is because you are saying it is shameful to be a woman. Whereas a woman dressing like a man is good! Because… reasons? It doesn’t actually make sense. And so we end up laughing at and shaming men simply for wearing different clothes. And while it negatively effects man, it is rooted in a view of women as weak and men aren’t supposed to look weak!

Misogyny effects your job options
            Most often we think of this affecting women. We don’t exactly see many women in high positions and offices. Now this is obviously a sign of a misogynist society, but how can it negatively affect men? Well first, let’s look at what a lot of stereotypical jobs women have: Teaching young children, nurse, or secretary. But now men doing those jobs are not viewed the same way.
            In surveys done about teaching, most people said that they would not be comfortable having a man teach younger children, but are more ok with men teaching towards high school and college level than they are women. But why? Men are supposed to be tough and show little emotion, something that obviously doesn’t jive well with young children. And so we have this tendency to think that the weaker more gentle women should take care of teaching the young children! Many people view the idea of men teaching young children as negative because it’s the “women’s job.” And as we get to the older grades, it is seen as the men’s job because, well, women don’t do as much learning and smart stuff as men? I dunno.
            But it’s a similar idea for nurses. Male nurses are made into a joke, literally. There are literally people that use male nurses as a joke. But how does that make sense? Well, women are seen as the gentle caretakers, taking care of the wounded, that is their place. So men being in that capacity is showing them as being gentle caretakers, being like a woman, and that’s bad in society. To be like a woman is to be weak and shameful.
            And secretaries don’t fare much better. Secretaries are the helpers, they are set under the higher more powerful men. So men being secretaries means they’re not good enough to have the helpers, they’re helping men like women do, which is bad! And if you’re a man under a woman, well that’s the worst that could happen because now you are under the weaker sex!

Misogyny harms men of all sexualities
            Quick, how do a lot of straight dudes see gay dudes? As a joke of course. “Ha, gayyyy!” Calling each other gay, acting gay as a joke, our culture has made being gay a joke. But how are lesbians viewed by straight guys? “Hell yeah, make out in front of me!” So why is it like this? Well, the answer lies in our heteronormative views.
            We see heterosexuality as the normal for men and women. So therefor, doing things to women is seen as the “man” thing to do, whereas doing things for men (And I say for cause it is often seen that men do something to women whereas women simply do something for men, which is BS) is seen as the “woman” thing to do. So two women making out? Well they’re being like the men! They’re doing the “man” thing to do, which is good and praiseworthy! Whereas two guys making out? Well, ew, they’re doing the “woman” thing to do. That’s effeminate and shameful. Gay people are often called “Faeries.” They’re doing something weak and feminine, which is bad for men to do. We have set that double standard harming gay men. But it doesn’t stop there.
            This misogyny also harms bisexual men (And women!) Now, the same rules generally apply, but it is also seen as slightly different. If a man says he is bisexual the stereotype is that he’s actually just gay and won’t admit it. And if a woman says she is bisexual, the stereotype is she is just trying to seem interesting to men. Notice the problem here? It automatically defaults to “Well they actually like men.” It has standard that no one could truly love a woman. So if they’re going after anyone other than women, well, it must not be the women, because even the straight guys only go for them for pleasure. And so focusing on men here, it is stating that you cannot be attracted to both because men are just so much better you should never love a woman.
            So what about straight men? I did say all sexualities afterall. Well, it can affect heterosexual men as well! For one, we have the culture of women as being a trophy. What do we call women that have a lot of sex? A slut. And so if you have sex with a slut, it’s “less” of an “accomplishment” than if you have sex with a girl that doesn’t have as much sex. So we’ve gone to policing what kind of women are favorable to go towards, because the men are upholding women as some sort of trophy. That it is somehow better if you have sex with a girl that hasn’t had a lot of sex. It is good for a guy to do have a lot of sex, but not for a woman. Because the woman is seen as having been “used.” (Remember, women are for men’s pleasure!)
            But this also goes into experimentation. Men that experiment with other men are seen as shameful or gay because remember, can’t truly love women. If a woman experiments it’s seen as hot (Cause it’s what men do), but if a guy does it, he’s gay.  That’s going into the territory of something that women are supposed to do! So now we are shaming guys for exploring their sexuality and seeing what they like simply because it’s the “woman” thing.

Misogyny dictates what you can be like

            The whole theme here is that being like women is shameful, because that’s seen as being weak. And for my final point, I want to show that it carries into many other facets. Men who talk in higher voices, have feminine mannerisms, take care of feminine chores, grow long hair, may use a “feminine” product like make up, liking a “feminine” game or show or movie, they’re all a joke or looked down upon and made fun of. You can’t even cry or show too much emotion without being too “feminine” and therefor made fun of. It is literally mentally and emotionally harmful to men. Our culture has created two pieces that have set these things to harm men. First, we have declared what is “for women.” They are the clothes, mannerisms, jobs, and everything else in life that are to be associated with women. And then we declare that to be like a woman is weak and therefor shameful. And so, men cannot be like women in any capacity, or they are weak and shameful. And so when I speak out against misogyny, I am not “ignoring” men or “hating” men. In fact, quite the opposite, when we empower and liberate women, we are inherently liberating men as well. Smash gender roles and be free! 

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

Name And Identity: Why I'm Going Back To Sammy

IF YOU HAVEN’T ALREADY, PLEASE READ MY INTRODUCTION TO NON-BINARY GENDERS FIRST

            This is probably the most difficult thing to explain is what’s going on with my name. When I was first coming out to people, I kept “Sammy” cause it was nice and neutral. Then I went to Amber cause it was feminine. And now I’m talking about changing back to Sammy sort of but not quite fully or something like that. So, first of all, to help everyone out, I’m gonna just state a few things to know that will help you understand everything.
1.      I am going to continue using Amber as my “professional” name at work and in certain situations but in general I am going to be known as Samantha “Sammy” Lily Birner
2.      I am going to use both female and neutral pronouns. So, she/her/hers is fine and that’s how I hope to be read in public. However, it would be nice to have they/them/their used sometimes too J
3.      I AM STILL TRANS AND AM STILL NOT A BOY, K? K

Now first I wanna discuss exactly how “Amber” came about to be as an identifier for me. Now it came up from a discussion of potential names, but the main part I’m talking about is why I wanted to change from “Sammy” in the first place. When I was first reconciling being transgender, I wasn’t sure how family would take it. In fact, I was fully prepared for the possibility that I was going to lose family entirely. So “Sam” became associated with that anxiety and being seen as a guy. But now that so many people have been accepting and coming around, it no longer has that association. And Amber did help me stop seeing myself as a guy, but it may have run its course with me.
So why go back to Sammy/Samantha? Well for one, it means a lot to me. So many people have known me as “Sammy” throughout my life. I have a lot of memories with it, and that’s even who Kurt knew me as when we started dating. And now that I’m feeling connection with my family again, I want to have that connection still. And my mom chose that name. While it may have been the wrong gendered version, she still chose it and she’s still my mom. And I don’t want to seem like I’m ashamed of my mom or what she named me, and I don’t want to be ashamed of my past. 

As far as middle name, I chose Lily as it is very personal. It is the name of a very very close friend who has been there from when I came out as bisexual to when I first struggled with gender to now. And so, I chose the name in honor of her.

But there is another part of why I want to use Sammy. Look back up at the pronouns. Remember how I used neutral pronouns as well? Well, I don’t identify as a man but… I don’t fully identify as a woman either. I mean, I like skirts, and being called she by strangers, and looking feminine. But think of it this way. Remember the spectrums? Well, in terms of how I express myself I’m kind of like this
Neutral-----------x--Feminine
Neutral---x---------Masculine
      I mostly express myself in a largely female way, cause that’s what I enjoy. (And notice the lines are separate. People can express both masculine and feminine traits.) But in terms of my self-concept of my gender, it’s more like this
Neutral------x----Woman
Neutral---------------Man

      I don’t identify as male in anyway, but I have a self-concept of my identity that is between neutral and woman. “Demi-girl” or “trans-femme” are terms I’ve heard to describe it. But overall, I’d just say I’m me. And Sammy is a nice neutral name that I can still associate with being seen as largely female. I’m non-binary, I’m neither a man, nor a woman, nor neutral. I am myself, and that is wonderful :)

Non-Binary Genders 101

            In general in America we’re all taught generally the same thing about gender. There’s boys and there’s girls. They are different. Boys have XY and penises and Girls have XX and vaginas. You might have been taught about the existence of transgender people but I doubt it. Now the major problem is… well, everything. It’s so oversimplified and wrong, I can’t even point to one issue with it. The gender binary is a hilarious oversimplified model of how humans actually work.
            Now to help you understand exactly why this is, I’m going to have to talk about all of the aspects of gender as we’re taught it in America. First there’s biological sex, then gender roles, gender expression, and finally gender identity (Or really what I’m getting at when I say “Gender.”)

Biological Sex
            Experts have understood for… well, quite a while now that sex and gender are two different things. The fact that it’s even on this list is practically a fluke. Now, the main reason people don’t know the difference is because they have no need to. A majority of people fit the binary male/female and have their biological sex and their gender match up. So for their purposes gender and sex are the same. The thing is, to talk about the problem with this and the problem with the binary is… we need to split this up into some more subpoints. So for our subpoints we need to talk about genitals, chromosomes, and sexual dimorphism.

Genitals
            “Well that’s easy, men have penises, women have vaginas.” Hahaha WRONG! And I don’t just mean cause trans women are women with penises and trans men are men with vaginas. See, the thing is uhhh… intersex people exist. They’re kind of people too. Intersex peoples’ genitals are far from that simple. Sometimes they have both in varying degrees, sometimes they have something that can’t be objectively stated to be either a penis or a vagina. Sometimes they have “ovatestes,” gonads that aren’t ovaries or testicles. Sometimes they have a mix of gonads. In case you couldn’t tell, it’s kind of complicated. But we’re so ingrained that people need to be male or female that often doctors perform surgery and…. Well, guess. And surprise, sometimes they’re wrong!

Chromosomes
            You should hazard a guess now that XX and XY doesn’t work. Here are just a few examples why: XXX, XXY, XYY, Swyer Syndrome (XY but have a vagina), and De La Chapelle Syndrome (XX but have a penis.) And that’s just a few of many things that can happen. In fact, there’s some question as to if having a Y actually has that much to do with it. We’ve seen some people that have XX in some parts of their body and XY in others, and they’re not even chimeras! So again, intersex people, they exist.

Sexual Dimorphism
            Now, I don’t know if these even actually go together, but I’m gonna put secondary sex characteristics in with these. For those that don’t know, sexual dimorphism is certain parts of the body that are similar but markedly different between male and female, and this I believe includes secondary sex characteristics like dropping voice in guys, wider hips in girls, boobs, etc. The thing is again… not always that simple. Guys can have high estrogen or low testosterone or girls vice versa. Some guys find themselves developing typically female secondary sex characteristics. These things are extremely complicated.

            In other words what I’m getting at is… even viewing biological sex as male and female is troublesome because it just doesn’t work that way! So many things go into it and influence it, it’s like a complicated spectrum we’re only beginning to grasp.

Gender Roles
            Ok, this one is going to be short cause most people understand them. Gender roles are things like the idea that women should be the ones to stay at home and take care of the house and kids. And men are supposed to be tough and manly and never show too much emotion. Yeah, just face it, it’s all bullshit and men and women should be allowed to socially do whatever they want. K? Good, glad we got that one out of the way.

Gender Expression
            This one is highly related to the last one but is still distinct. Gender expression is the things we do to express ourselves that are associated with a certain gender. This is things like mannerisms, clothes, or interests. And everyone has a mix of stuff like this. I wear make-up, so there’s a point for feminine. I like cargo pants, there’s a point for masculine. I screech and go “Awwww” when I see kittens. That’s neutral, cause seriously, if you don’t do that you’re a monster. So what I’m getting at here is… it’s another spectrum type thing. People express themselves in multiple ways with varying degrees. There are feminine men and masculine women. What we even see as “masculine” and “feminine” is almost entirely a social construct developed by our culture, and cultures don’t all share what things are seen as what.

Gender Identity

            Now this is the big one. This is the very sense of self. This is your self-concept of being a man or a woman. The thing is, notice how everything was on a spectrum? Yeah, so is this. See, gender identity is also a cultural thing! Because it’s heavily related to the other concepts. Even though men can be feminine, we still have associations of certain things with female. But not all cultures have simply “Man” and “Woman.” There are cultures that have 3 genders, or even some that have 5! There is one culture that has Man, Woman, A woman that takes on male roles, a man that takes on female roles, and neutral. (This of course is very oversimplified from their language.)
            But the point being it isn’t a super neat male/female box. It is, in fact, totally possible to identify differently! Some people have a self-concept that is neither male nor female. Some people have a self-concept that is both male and female. And there’s tons of others inbetween. Genderfluid, where people’s self-concept changes throughout the day/week/month/year. Agender, feeling neither gender. Bi-gender, two spirit, neutrois, demi-girl, demi-boy, there’s so much! Because it’s not a neat little box, and that’s so awesome, cause we’re all different! We all associate on different parts of each scale. You can have a penis, be super feminine, but identify with no gender. You can have ambiguous genitals, be very masculine, but identify as female. We’re all so unique and wonderful, and we need to realize that! We don’t need to be put in these silly “male” and “female” boxes that don’t truly describe anything anyway. We need to start seeing gender for what it is; complicated, personal, and wonderful.

Saturday, May 16, 2015

50 Things I've Wanted To Say But Never Said

We all have things we want to say but we don’t. It might be because we’re afraid to say it. It might be because there’s never been a good chance to say it. And sometimes, we just never thought to say it. So, I’m going to take this opportunity to just say 50 things I can think of that I’ve wanted to say, but haven’t said. (And it would be totally awesome is people commented some things they’ve wanted to say but haven’t said :P)

1.      “New Atheists” on the internet are honestly almost more annoying than evangelical Christians
2.      The term I would use for myself religiously is “Christian Atheist” but not in a way of “God doesn’t exist but I like things Jesus said” but more in a weird look at “God does not ontologically exist” and it’s kinda complicated and sounds pretentious but ah well
3.      Everything with Tyler Perry is awful. Especially the Madea movies. They’re racist sexist transphobic garbage
4.      Most of you that complain about feminism frequently post things that show the need for feminism in the first place
5.      dean john boggs, former dean of Michigan Lutheran Seminary, if you somehow manage to read this, I want you to know that I intentionally didn’t capitalize your name because you are without a doubt one of the worst people it has ever been my misfortune to know, and you caused horrible pain and damage at MLS
6.      Suicide is NOT a choice
7.      Soldiers are not worthy of respect simply by virtue of being a soldier. If they’re an asshole, giving them a gun and telling them it’s ok to kill middle easterners doesn’t make them not an asshole
8.      Also let me be clear that I do NOT blame soldiers themselves for our shitty unjustified wars, it is the politicians fault for using the poor of this country as pawns to kill the poor of those countries.
9.      That being said, if you are a soldier that enjoyed killing people in the middle east, you are a horrible human being
10.  Chris Kyle was a horrible human being
11.  Cops are not all bad people, but cops are all tools in the political game of the rich enforcing a corrupt system.
12.  Cops are not there to protect us, they are there to enforce laws, and often times those laws do the opposite or only protect the rich and powerful.
13.  Conservative Christianity is an inherently harmful system and holding those beliefs automatically places you in a role in perpetuating something that is actively harming and killing people, especially LGBTQ+ people. Whether or not you are a good person individually, the system itself is bad.
14.  Using “it’s my personal belief” is not an excuse and does not make something suddenly ok. I don’t care that it’s a personal belief, it’s still harmful and I actively hope that conservative Christianity ceases to exist
15.  Don’t worry, I also hope conservative Islam, Hinduism, and all other religions with conservative versions similarly should all cease to exist entirely
16.  All clothes and names should be considered gender neutral. A guy can be named Sarah and wear a dress.
17.  If you believe men are supposed to be the leaders in the family, you’re not following “traditional values”, you’re just a misogynist
18.  If you believe women should not be pastors/priests you are a misogynist
19.  Really, if you believe there is anything that men can be that women shouldn’t be, you’re a misogynist
20.  I’m totally ok with more than 2 people dating at once. If you want to have a 5 way poly relationship, go for it.
21.  I don’t care if you’re against abortion, if you’re for the death penalty or against food stamps/government aid, YOU ARE NOT PRO LIFE
22.  Spanking is bad parenting. Period. We have tons of scientific evidence to support it. It’s bad. Stop.
23.  “Male” and “Female” are not the only genders and we need to stop pretending that they are
24.  Drugs need to be decriminalized and we should treat addicts as patients, not criminals
25.  If you are not actively speaking out against discrimination, you are implicitly aiding in it. In other words, yes, if you are not with us, you ARE necessarily against us
26.  In all reality, teens and young adults are better than the older generations, get over it
27.  Technology is not destroying humanity. Get over your fetishization of “the good old days”
28.  Saying that poor people or mentally ill or disabled people should not be allowed to reproduce is literally eugenics (Which is literally Hitler)
29.  If you complain more about people abusing food stamps than by the fact that even with food stamps we have people that can’t afford to feed their family, you’re a bad person
30.  If you complain about “Why isn’t there white pride?” You’re either historically ignorant, or racist
31.  If you complain about “Why isn’t there straight pride?” You ARE ignorant, and probably a homophobe
32.  I don’t care that “phobe” means fear and you’re “not afraid of gay people.” Words change, it’s culturally come to mean someone that disapproves of homosexuality. So get over it… homophobe
33.  I would almost prefer a Republican over a Libertarian, cause at least Republicans worship God rather than the “free market”
34.  We are not a free country.
35.  Troops do not fight for our freedom, they fight for global corporate and political interests to serve the rich (And it’s not their fault, it’s the fault of the rich)
36.  Churches should never EVER have an American flag in them
37.  The pledge of allegiance should not be said at school… or sporting events… or ever.
38.  The flag is not a symbol of freedom, it is a freedom of state oppression, discrimination, and remorselessly killing members of Muslim countries
39.  I would happily burn an American flag
40.  I don’t “hate America” or “Americans.” I hate oppressive states. So calm down
41.  I fully support the Baltimore rioters and other people rioting over social injustice
42.  If you’re more concerned about broken windows and people stealing things to live than by police killing black people, you’re a bad person
43.  “Sticks and stones” is a BS lie, and words are infinitely more painful
44.  If your solution to bullying is telling kids to toughen up, you are one of the shittiest kinds of people that exists
45.  If you think the Israelites literally committing genocide in the Old Testament was ok because “God told them to” you’re a bad person
46.  If you think people are poor cause they’re “lazy” you’re ignorant AND a bad person
47.  If you support “American Family Association” or “Family Research Council” or other similar “pro-family” organizations, you’re not pro-family, you’re just pro-discrimination           
48.  Voter ID laws are discriminatory dog whistle politics meant to keep poor people and especially black people from voting. They’re bad, mmkay
49.  Don’t misunderstand what I said earlier, I don’t think certain things are bad cause they disagree with me, I think they’re bad cause they actively contribute to discrimination.
50.  I love my family to death, they will always be my family, I will always love them and be kind to them and want to see them… but for the past two years, I have hated the beliefs of everyone in my family, and I actively hope for they leave Conservative Christianity (NOT Leave Christianity, just conservative Christianity. I want all of you to leave WELS and the Baptist church and such. As in, I actively hope for it to happen.)


-end rant-

Why I Must Be Open That I Am A Bisexual Trans Woman

            I am a bisexual transgender woman. I fully accept all LGBTQ+ people. I fully affirm lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, genderqueer, pansexual, and so on and so forth people as equally valid. And I must speak out.

            I’ve been asked a number of times by a number of people in a number of ways why I speak out. Usually it’s some variation of “Why does everyone need to know?” Or also “Why do you need to be so open about it?” And it’s usually it’s from a place of concern. They know about the discrimination and issues gender and sexual minorities face and they don’t want me to face that. But it’s still an odd question right? “Why does everyone need to know?” But I have a counter-question.

Why do we see it as something that should be hidden?

Now, I know that some family will likely read this, and I know that 99% of my family unfortunately does not and will not support my positions. But that won’t stop me from saying… there’s nothing to hide or be ashamed of. We see straight couples all the time wearing matching clothes and silly shirts and holding hands and being romantic in public. But then people look at a gay couple and are like “Ugh, why do you need to make it so public?” or “We get it, you’re gay, why do you need to shove it in our faces?” (Cause straight couples TOTALLY don’t do that, right?)
            So why should it be so hidden? Cause some straight people might find it icky? Because you believe it’s a sin? Yeah, you believe being Wiccan is a sin too, but if someone wears something that states they’re a Wiccan you shouldn’t be like “QUIT BEING SO PUBLIC ABOUT IT AND SHOVING IT IN MY FACE!”
            The fact is, when you’re asking the question, you’re saying “Go back in the closet, I don’t want to see it.” The Christian Right often laments how accepting of “the gays” America is but really… there’s plenty more work to be done still. We’re still telling lesbian, gay, bisexual people that it’s shameful, it needs to be hidden, it’s not worthy of being as public as straight people.
            And then we wrap it up in concern. “Well, you shouldn’t be so open about it cause you’ll face discrimination!” And people, you’re sweet, you really are. But stop trying to stifle change and just tell us to keep quiet. Keeping quiet doesn’t work. Keeping quiet doesn’t change things. Keeping quiet is not going to fix the problems that we face. Maybe instead of asking “Why do you need to be so public when you’ll face discrimination?” we should be asking “Why are people discriminating against us?” In fact, I have a few questions to ask in return.

Why are 40% of homeless youth some form of LGBTQ+?

            When you ask “Why do you need to be so public?” you’re essentially saying that for homeless youth, it’s their fault for coming out. They were risking discrimination! And if you responded that… think of how fucked up that is? You are saying it’s their fault they’re homeless instead of, ya know, being their parents’ fault for kicking them out, peoples’ fault for treating them shitty, employers’ fault for refusing to hire them. Instead of telling us to keep quiet, why aren’t you tell those people to stop kicking us out of homes?

Why are 21% of young bisexual people attempting suicide each year?

            Why must they be so visible? Well if visibility is the problem, why is suicide such a problem? And there will unfortunately be the people that place all blame for suicide on the victim. (Well it was their choice! Or something just as shitty.)  But why are we thinking that or thinking “Oh, why did they have to choose that?” When you are suicidal, you do not realize there are other options. I know, I’ve been there. So instead of asking why they did it, maybe we should be asking why people are making life so horrible for them they felt they had no other option.

Why are 1 in 12 trans people murdered (1 in 8 if they are a trans woman of color)?

            Why must we be so visible? Well, as a trans woman, I know all the safety tips. Don’t walk alone at night, don’t go to certain areas, don’t make it too well known being trans, but wait wait wait, before I go further… Why are we putting on emphasis on what I need to to do be safe instead of trying to figure out why the fuck people are killing us at an alarming rate? This isn’t just standard safety for everyone. We are being killed way faster than anyone else. And it’s not just strangers. Former and current lovers have killed trans women. A trans woman was killed by her own father! So clearly even if we follow all the tips… we still might be killed. So why are we not addressing the problem of people that think it’s ok to kill us?

Why are we still allowed to be fired?

            There are still an alarming number of states that totally allow someone to be fired on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. And it happens! (Look back up at the homelessness statistic…) And some people will say “Well why’d you come out to a homophobic boss?” or “Why’d you come out when you knew the state allowed it?” But why are we asking that question instead of asking why the hell are they allowed to fire people for that? Why are we blaming LGBTQ+ folk instead of blaming the people that are freaking firing them?!

Why are people more shocked by my openness than by what happens to us?

            I am open because I have no damn reason not to be. None. I don’t care if you believe it’s “icky” or sinful. I have no reason to hide. I have nothing to be ashamed of. And neither do the rest of my LGBTQ+ friends. My lesbian friends have nothing to be ashamed of. My transgender friends have nothing to be ashamed of. My bisexual, gay, genderqueer, genderfluid, pansexual, queer friends have nothing to be ashamed of.
           
So family that reads this, know that I love and cherish you, and I will never wish bad upon you. But I won’t apologize for saying, I will always be fighting against calling any of us sinful. I will always be fighting against the systematic belief systems that have forced us into homelessness and suicide for so long. I will always be fighting against the idea that we are something that needs to change of be hidden.

You will always be my family, I will always love you and talk to you and be nice to you and be happy to see you. But I cannot sugar coat that if you believe being lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or any of the other various sexual orientations or gender identities are wrong, we are not and cannot be on the same side. And just as I’m sure you will actively push back against my beliefs, I also will be actively fighting against your beliefs.

Monday, May 4, 2015

Here's The Things Ichabod Got Wrong About Zak And Me

            For those who have never heard of Ichabod, I’m going to do my best to be as neutral as possible in explanation (And Greg Jackson, please feel free to tell me if I got anything factually wrong in this part, I want to be accurate!)
            Ichabod is a blog run by Greg Jackson, a former WELS (Wisonsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod, the church I grew up in) pastor who left the synod and now works independently. His blog follows key news from WELS especially in relation to the college run by WELS, and important figures in WELS, particularly pointing out things he and/or others find wrong that they are doing. He also does sermons each Sunday via stream, and posts about other news usually gardening or other churches such as the Episcopal church.

            He’s made many posts about me coming out as trans and my friend Zak coming out as gay since graduating from MLC. He’s entitled to whatever opinions he has about us or what happened, so my goal isn’t to attack his opinions. Instead, for those that have read his posts, I’d like to address some of the factual errors that have come up in his posts about us.


“Among other things, Zak bragged about posting photos of himself on a gay porn site.”
            This one was kind of hilarious when we saw it actually. The reason this one came about was another post that I could not find in which Zak messaged him and mentioned Grindr. He then sarcastically referred to it as a porno site as a bit of humor. Whether or not you find it funny, as many already know, and the rest of you who have the modern capability to google something, know that Grindr is simply a chat and dating app (Not even a website.) And so obviously Zak wasn’t bragging about anything but, well, being silly.


MLC was going to let Zac Stowe graduate with his degree, not give him an assignment,
and he was supposed to keep quiet for a few years.
            This one was also hilarious when we saw the conspiracy theory type message. Now this one can’t totally be blamed on Greg Jackson as he has “informants” within WELS and MLC, and this came from one of them. So they are to blame for the silliness here, but there are a few points in this one to clear up.
1.      Zak was denied student teaching for a totally different reason. Zak wrote a paper for a class which troubled the professor in Zak’s views in regards to Christianity. This resulted in him being counseled, and when they did not think he was ready to student teach in a Christian school because of his troubling views, he was denied student teaching.
2.      Zak did not graduate with his degree. At least, not exactly. Because he was denied student teaching, he only got an Education Studies degree, which is a non-teaching degree, and therefor he would never get an assignment regardless
3.      No one outside of Zak’s close friends knew he was gay (And even if others did, it was a fluke.) Zak confided his secret in a few close friends. This secret was guarded carefully because, well, we all knew he could likely get expelled for it. He was terrified of the school finding out (Which makes the idea of having a deal with the VP being even more ridiculous.)
4.      Zak had no plans to keep quiet after graduation. Zak pretty much already planned on coming out after graduation. He would’ve never made the deal in the first place, cause it really wouldn’t have gotten him anything.
5.      People were threatened to not be able to student teach for being friends with him and me on Facebook. If MLC was so willing to know about us and just hide us, why would this happen? In fact, why should it happen regardless, seriously?
6.      Even if Zak did admit he was gay to Schone, he wouldn’t necessarily need to have been quiet. This one is a little complicated at first, but think about it. Admitting to being gay would simply be him saying “Hey, I have attraction to men.” Guess what? We’ve had that happen in WELS already. They’re the people of “People of Grace Lutherans” that have admitted to same sex attraction. But they don’t act on that attraction. WELS would’ve gladly let him speak… if he were speaking that way at least.
7.      Seriously though, lol at the idea of the VP already knowing.

Sorry, but I can only report rumors. That is factual reporting.
Rumor: a currently circulating story or report of uncertain or doubtful truth.  Ok umm… no, that in fact, is not factual reporting. It literally by definition is not. Also, fun fact, you can report whatever you want! You could make stuff up, it doesn’t even need to be rumors. It could just be total lies or even literal hard evidence. So no, you can’t only post rumors. YOU CAN DO IT, I BELIEVE IN YOU :D

Neither are you a woman because you are taking some female hormones and want to be female. That is not my position on the issue - it is medicine's position.
            Actually, it’s not medicine’s position! This one both misses the point and gets into the sticky point of gender and sex, so there are a few things to discuss, the first of which is what we use to determine what makes someone a man or a woman.
            “Simple,” you might be saying “Men have penises and XY chromosomes and women have vaginas and XX chromosomes.” And for a majority of the time, that’s right!.... buuuut it’s not exactly an absolute thing, as humans have a lot of sexual dimorphism (Things that are different between male and female.) But to simplify the already incredibly complex explanation of biological sex, I’m going to boil it down to 3 key sexually dimorphic parts of the body: Chromosomes, genitals, and brain structure.
            It is easiest to teach children that men have XY and women have XX. This however, is vaaaaastly oversimplified. In fact, we’ve found non-chimera people that have both XX and XY chromosomes in different parts of their body!
            This also ignores interesting chromosomal patterns. Not only do we have XXX, XXY, and XYY happening but we also have De La Chapelle syndrome (Having XX chromosomes but having a penis) and Swyer syndrome (Having XY chromosomes but having a vagina.) Now, I haven’t had my chromosomes tested so, the best we can go upon is assumption that I have XY.

            Genitals also are far more complicated than we think. While penis and vagina are the most common, we have a large spectrum of intersex people that have anything from ambiguous genitals that are inbetween and impossible to tell if male or female, people with both a penis and vagina, and people with gonads that are neither ovaries nor testicles. So… are they men or women? They don’t have the things we like to say are specifically for men or women. So genitals are pretty iffy on the factor too.

            But not the last one, brain structure, is a very critical one. The brain is the center of our concept of our gender, of being male or female. Studies show that kids have a concept of being male or female very early on in life. And brain studies have shown that key parts of the brain are (Generally) different between men and women. So what about trans people?
            Well, the really interesting part is that trans people’s brains have been shown to have the same structure as their gender identity, rather than their birth assigned gender! So, it is very likely that if my brain were examined, it would match the structure of women’s brains.
            Not only this, research has shown again and again that medical transition is the best option for treating the conflicts trans people feel. Attempting to change the brain not only doesn’t work, but can cause serious damage. And the brain is also the center of our concept of self.
            So, while it’s easy to say that because of my genitals, I’m a guy, science is far more complicated than that. And in fact, scientists have generally agreed that taking into account these factors, trans women are, in fact, women, and trans men are, in fact, men.
            So, sorry GJ, modern medicine is pretty well on my side here J

You said you were leaving WELS, but you seem to have a lot of allies already in the synod.
            If you look at the post the last point was mentioning, you’ll see this with a bunch of pictures following it. This again is one in which there are a few points to be made.
1.      I do not have allies in the synod. Everyone that I know of that is fully supportive of me either was never in WELS, or has left WELS. And multiple people still in WELS have stopped talking to me altogether. So no, I don’t have a lot of allies.
2.      Students pretending to be gay is NOT supportive. Notice the picture of the two boys with the heart? Now, I really really want to give GJ the benefit of the doubt and say he doesn’t actually think this means WELS people are supportive, but just in case, if it isn’t obvious, they’re not supporting gay people. They’re making fun of gay people. Pretending to be gay is a joke, it’s something to be laughed at. That’s not supportive, that makes gay people feel worse, because it makes them to be something to be laughed at.
3.      Cross-dressing is not necessarily supporting trans people. The pictures of the pastors in dresses is not something that makes me “feel better” or think they’d be “open” to me. It’s obviously another thing to be made fun of. It’s not supporting me, it’s laughing at me. It’s making me a joke. That’s part of why I was so afraid to come out. I was something to be mocked, because wearing girls clothes would be shameful and funny and something to be laughed at.
4.      Cross-dressing is not the same thing as transgender. In case you’re someone just figuring out that gender is a cultural thing, cross-dressing doesn’t make someone transgender. If a guy wears a dress that doesn’t mean he wants to be a girl, it could just mean that like… he likes that dress. We associate dresses with women culturally but objectively… it’s just clothes. It’s not objectively male or female, our culture defines it as such. What clothes you wear has no bearing on who you are. Hell, most cross-dressers are heterosexual men!

Now, this last one isn’t something wrong, it’s a question he posed. And now, I want to take time to actually answer the questions for him.

Where was the pastoral care for Sam Birner and Zak Stowe
at WELS Martin Luther College?
Or at Michigan Lutheran Seminary, also WELS?
His congregation?
His fellow students - many of them future pastors and teachers?
Ok, I lied, one error. You used male pronouns when you mention two of us, so it should be “they.” J
Anyway, GJ, I would like to answer your questions, because we sort of agree for once. I wondered the exact same thing while I was going through my schooling and going to WELS churches. So where was the pastoral care? It either wasn’t there, or was just really well hidden.
We were terrified to tell pastors about any of it. We didn’t have support. It was never stated “If you’re struggling or suicidal, you can talk to us.” There was no offer for us when we were suicidal. And in fact, the environment made us only more terrified.
I do agree with one thing. Those pictures of people pretending to be gay and cross-dressing and all of that? I agree, that should’ve never been done. I saw it everywhere, even in talent shows and other school sanctioned shows. And it was an awful idea.

Not because it “promoted” any LGBT stuff, because it made us terrified. Because we were made to be jokes. We were made to be mocked, laughed at, ridiculed, and totally dismissed. We weren’t offered comfort, we were offered mocking. That’s where it was, behind the mocking. So I agree, where was the help? Cause I sure as hell didn’t see it.

Friday, April 24, 2015

What Would You Do If I Were Murdered?

            Trans people have a 1 in 12 chance of being murdered. This number goes up to 1 in 8 if they are a trans woman of color. 75% of us will be homeless at some point. Almost 1 in 2 attempt suicide. These are pretty insane statistics, right? But let’s make it even more personal. What if I was murdered? What would you do if I was murdered?

            And I don’t mean this in the typical “make me feel better” way. I know a lot of you would show up at my funeral, I know people would miss me, I know my life has value. But that’s not what I’m asking. I’m asking, what would you do after? Would it end at crying at my grave and reminiscing sometimes?

            Would you sit at home and be sad? Would you send the murderer to jail and feel justice is served? Would you say “People are already talking about it” and stay at home?

Or would you fight? Would you speak out against this? Would you fight to change that statistic? Would you seek to end violence against trans people? Would you want to prevent other families and friends from knowing the pain?

I know you’d be sad, but would you fight for me? Would you talk about me and spread my story? Would you push for trans friendly culture and laws? Would you try to change the world to prevent this from happening again?

We have a 1 in 12 chance of being murdered. Just by the end of February this year Trans Women were murdered at a rate of one every week. And people sit back and think “Well others are talking about it” or “Murder is already illegal” or “It’s not my place to talk about it.”

We’re dying! My sisters are being killed! My trans family is dying. And we don’t take it sitting down. We do our best to speak out, we do our best to fight back, and we’ve been doing that for years and years. And we’re still dying. We’re still being kicked out of homes and fired and beaten and killed.

What would you do if I was murdered? If you would fight when it’s too late… why not fight now before it’s too late? If you would fight for me after I’m murdered, why not fight for me before it happens?

We’re hurting. We’re rejected. We’re dying.

Please.


Help us