Since I’m venturing into more
sensitive and controversial territory, challenges to what I’m writing will
naturally come up. Which is good! It should be challenged! If everyone just
agreed with what I’m saying, there really wouldn’t be much of a reason for me
to write anything, would there?
But, some things can get pretty
ridiculous. There comes in fallacies, attacks, and just plain silliness in
responding to me. I’m ok with debating, but at least make it worthwhile. So, I
want to write this as an open letter to discuss why certain attacks to what I
write are ridiculous (As opposed to actual discussion points.) Also, please
note that I’ve gotten multiple comments about what I’ve written and I’m pulling
this from multiple experiences. So no, I’m not writing to address you (Whoever “you” are) and I’m not
writing this to be passive aggressive about one person. (Makes me think of that
whole “You’re so vain you probably think this song is about you”)
You’re so young, you don’t know how the world really works
This one really has two problems
with it. The first, is using age as a criticism, and the second is stating a
lack of knowledge of the world. The first one is easy to point out why it’s not
really an argument. Cause… it’s not arguing anything. In fact, it’s avoiding arguing anything. You’re
basically saying “Well, I can’t really dispute it, but you’re young, so it must
be wrong!” The age of a person doesn’t determine whether an argument is wrong
or not. If an 8 year old says a proof of the Pythagorean theorem, they aren’t
wrong just because they’re 8 years old.
The second part is problematic
because it implies a universal knowledge. That “if you only knew what I knew or experienced, you wouldn’t
think that way!” And you might be right. In your circumstance or with your
thoughts, I probably wouldn’t… so what? That’s still not arguing anything. It’s
really just a more sophisticated equivalent to saying “Well I’m smart and you’re
dumb.” Not to mention saying it as though there’s some universal knowledge
about how the world “really” works (Whatever that means.) If there were, we’d
probably have a lot less arguments about how the government should work.
It really brings to mind two
options that usually happen. If someone disagrees
with you they’re just young and naïve and don’t know what they’re talking
about. But if they agree with you,
they must be smart for their age! Totes not a double standard though
I thought like that too once, you’ll grow out of it.
This one is pretty similar to the
last one, implying age is a factor. And to a certain degree I get it. Anarchist
culture is associated with punks and rebellion and “edgy” teenagers mad at
their parents and all that jazz. But again, this fails to really actually
address any arguments. It again is just a slightly different way of saying “I’m
smart, you’re dumb.” You’re not actually saying anything intellectual. (And all
that before even getting into the history of anarchism as a political movement
and the people of all ages that follow it.) And this also makes this assumption
that everyone will be like you. It’s really similar to before with “You just
don’t have the knowledge/experience/etc. that I do.” But that’s not an
argument. People have all kinds of different knowledge and experiences and don’t
agree with each other. Otherwise I could start saying “Ah, yes, I remember when
I went through my libertarian phase.”
You just wanna seem “edgy” and different
Woah, wait, I shouldn’t even need
to say anything about this. You can read
minds?!?!
You don’t know the solution to all of the world’s problems
And you’re right, I don’t! And I
will fully and be the first to admit that! Good job, you got me to admit to the
obvious. But pulling away from my sarcasm mode, I legitimately don’t understand
why this one comes up. Not even to me, to just about any post (Especially left
wing posts) I see. It’s the same thing every time. And yet never do any of
those people claim to have all the solutions. It’s like something that
dissenters like to just pull out of the air to criticize them. But when you
think about it, it can be turned right back.
“You don’t know all the solutions!”
Ok, so why do you get to disagree with me? YOU DON’T HAVE ALL THE SOLUTIONS TO
THE WORLD’S PROBLEMS EITHER. CHECKMATE. And then I proceed to laugh maniacally
while riding into the sunset holding my copy of the Communist Manifesto.
But really the issue comes in that
no one wants to admit they (in general) have their answers too. When they
disagree with what I write, hey, they already have part of an opinion on how
the world should work! Ever read something political and agree with it? Wow, you
have another opinion of how the world
should work! Ever disagreed with something the president or congress instated?
You damn well better believe you have an opinion on how the world should work!
So why are only the people vocal about their thoughts being yelled at for it?
Now, I’m not gonna say I’m 100%
right about everything. I mean, I believe I’m right but… generally, everyone
believes their position is right. It’s not like that’s some new concept. And I
accept I can be wrong about things. But some people act like I’m just pulling
my thoughts out of my butt.
There really is no way to word this
without sounding arrogant, but I’ve read books. I’ve read books and watched movies and listened to speeches and researched and read more writings, and all
kinds of things to reach my position. So if we’re going by the things said to
me, it’s ok, they’d reach my position if they just knew what I knew. I mean sure, people will
disagree, and that’s ok. And I’ll probably be wrong about things, and that’s ok
too. But at least I care enough to have the passion to talk about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment